<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickPost: Arduino + Alcohol Gas Sensor + WiShield + LCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/09/09/quickpost-arduino-alcohol-gas-sensor-wishield-lcd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/09/09/quickpost-arduino-alcohol-gas-sensor-wishield-lcd/</link>
	<description>(blog 'DidierStevens)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:37:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jukda</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/09/09/quickpost-arduino-alcohol-gas-sensor-wishield-lcd/#comment-35957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jukda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1751#comment-35957</guid>
		<description>This is so cool!!! And I agree with the above poster, sometimes a alco-lock could save you from a lot of trouble ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so cool!!! And I agree with the above poster, sometimes a alco-lock could save you from a lot of trouble <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABI</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/09/09/quickpost-arduino-alcohol-gas-sensor-wishield-lcd/#comment-35768</link>
		<dc:creator>ABI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1751#comment-35768</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I could really use an alco-lock in my mail program! ;) Nice gadget. It would be even cooler if it could power itself from a USB port!

I&#039;ve been reading your old posts about the Basic Process Manipulation Tool Kit and other cool stuff like SRP whitelist bypassing btw. That got me thinking. If SRP checks for CreateProcess and LoadLibrary calls to block stuff, and when you have bypassed this with the BPMTK, has anyone checked if SRP even checks for all the calls we can use to execute code? Lots of exploits use the old 16-bit WinExec() in their shell code instead of CreateProcess. Does SRP even check for that? Anyone know? Would be a pretty easy bypass if it didn&#039;t, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I could really use an alco-lock in my mail program! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Nice gadget. It would be even cooler if it could power itself from a USB port!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading your old posts about the Basic Process Manipulation Tool Kit and other cool stuff like SRP whitelist bypassing btw. That got me thinking. If SRP checks for CreateProcess and LoadLibrary calls to block stuff, and when you have bypassed this with the BPMTK, has anyone checked if SRP even checks for all the calls we can use to execute code? Lots of exploits use the old 16-bit WinExec() in their shell code instead of CreateProcess. Does SRP even check for that? Anyone know? Would be a pretty easy bypass if it didn&#8217;t, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
