<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quickpost: Disinformational Tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/</link>
	<description>(blog 'DidierStevens)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s true -- depending on your personal guidelines for who you add or don&#039;t add, that might or might not add much disinformation.  Then again, if you have the timeline available for when someone added someone else, you might be able to more accurately map who was a &quot;real&quot; follow, versus who was just a reciprocating follow.  

I&#039;d be curious to see a study in the general case -- what information is available, and to what degree it survives disinformation.  I suspect that even with a fair amount of bogus data the good data can still be filtered through relatively effectively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true &#8212; depending on your personal guidelines for who you add or don&#8217;t add, that might or might not add much disinformation.  Then again, if you have the timeline available for when someone added someone else, you might be able to more accurately map who was a &#8220;real&#8221; follow, versus who was just a reciprocating follow.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to see a study in the general case &#8212; what information is available, and to what degree it survives disinformation.  I suspect that even with a fair amount of bogus data the good data can still be filtered through relatively effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didier Stevens</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didier Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an idea too! I&#039;m not concerned about that network mapping, since I follow back most followers. Guess that&#039;s pretty random too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an idea too! I&#8217;m not concerned about that network mapping, since I follow back most followers. Guess that&#8217;s pretty random too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s funny. I was thinking of something very similar this morning. It was less focused on disinformational tweets themselves, and more focused on adding random people to your follow list to disrupt automatic social-network mapping attempts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny. I was thinking of something very similar this morning. It was less focused on disinformational tweets themselves, and more focused on adding random people to your follow list to disrupt automatic social-network mapping attempts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: securitydreamer</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[securitydreamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Mad Libs for Twitter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Mad Libs for Twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didier Stevens</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didier Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent point. They could use this to create less suspicious accounts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point. They could use this to create less suspicious accounts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livibetter</title>
		<link>http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/05/10/quickpost-disinformational-tweets/#comment-34922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[livibetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1400#comment-34922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If spammers find this, they will use this to avoid being blocked and we couldn&#039;t really sure if that is a spammer or not. Sigh, good things can always be used for bad purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If spammers find this, they will use this to avoid being blocked and we couldn&#8217;t really sure if that is a spammer or not. Sigh, good things can always be used for bad purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

