Comments on: Update: XORSearch V1.4.0 http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/04/19/update-xorsearch-v140/ (blog 'DidierStevens) Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:37:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Didier Stevens http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/04/19/update-xorsearch-v140/#comment-34665 Didier Stevens Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:11:59 +0000 http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1346#comment-34665 That's one of my requirements for this tool: being able to compile it with a standard C compiler on different OSes. The EXE is compiled with Borland, and the C library (like printf) is linked in. And then there is also a digital signature (Authenticode) adding to the size. That’s one of my requirements for this tool: being able to compile it with a standard C compiler on different OSes.

The EXE is compiled with Borland, and the C library (like printf) is linked in. And then there is also a digital signature (Authenticode) adding to the size.

]]> By: Bryan Harris http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/04/19/update-xorsearch-v140/#comment-34664 Bryan Harris Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:39:53 +0000 http://blog.didierstevens.com/?p=1346#comment-34664 Excellent tool! I will definitely use this. I doubly appreciate the lack of windows system calls. It built without any modifications on gcc. Thanks. I did a little looking at your exe with a tool of my own. It's mostly a neat toy, but I thought you might be interested. http://randommusingsofarealgeek.blogspot.com/2009/04/why-are-windows-executables-so-big.html Excellent tool! I will definitely use this. I doubly appreciate the lack of windows system calls. It built without any modifications on gcc. Thanks.

I did a little looking at your exe with a tool of my own. It’s mostly a neat toy, but I thought you might be interested. http://randommusingsofarealgeek.blogspot.com/2009/04/why-are-windows-executables-so-big.html

]]>